
Court says only a Senate-confirmed board has that power
A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration’s effort to remove Michael Abramowitz, the director of Voice of America (VOA), ruling that the move violated federal law.
The ruling
U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth issued a permanent injunction on August 28, stating that only the International Broadcasting Advisory Board, which requires Senate confirmation, has the legal authority to dismiss a VOA director. Since President Trump had previously dissolved that board, his appointee, Kari Lake, lacked the power to fire Abramowitz. The court described the attempted dismissal as “plainly contrary to law.”
What triggered the dispute
Kari Lake, appointed by Trump to oversee the U.S. Agency for Global Media, had ordered Abramowitz removed after he refused reassignment to manage a transmitting station. The decision was part of a larger restructuring effort at USAGM that included layoffs and attempts to consolidate leadership control over federally funded international broadcasters.
Responses from both sides
Abramowitz, a veteran journalist and former Washington Post editor, praised the court’s decision. He emphasized that VOA’s independence is essential for its mission of providing reliable, fact-based news to global audiences, particularly in regions where press freedom is restricted.
Lake strongly criticized the ruling, framing it as an attack on presidential authority. She vowed to appeal, arguing that the executive branch must retain the ability to restructure agencies and remove officials who resist new directives.
Why it matters
The case highlights an ongoing struggle over the independence of U.S.-funded international media outlets. Critics of Trump’s moves see them as attempts to politicize VOA, while supporters argue that the administration should have greater control over taxpayer-funded institutions.
For now, Abramowitz will remain in his post, and the ruling reasserts a clear boundary: leadership at Voice of America cannot be removed without Senate involvement.
Bottom line
The clash over VOA is bigger than one job; it’s about the balance between executive authority and the legal safeguards designed to protect press independence. With an appeal likely, the fight over who controls America’s international voice is far from over.
Family Says ChatGPT Became Their Son’s “Suicide Coach”
16 Classic Cars from Top Brands That No Longer Exist
-
Credit: Shutterstock President Donald Trump unveiled his latest White House addition Friday evening, turning the historic Rose Garden into...
-
Credit: Shutterstock ‘I don’t know,’ says HHS Secretary when asked about U.S. death count Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Health...
-
Credit: Shutterstock Attorney General calls it a “forced military occupation” Washington, D.C. has filed a lawsuit against the Trump...
-
Credit: Shutterstock Consumer slowdown and weak job growth raise concern The economist who sounded the alarm before the 2008...
-
Credit: Shutterstock “Workers Over Billionaires” rallies aim to send a national message Labor Day is shaping up to be...
-
Credit: Shutterstock Safety crackdown or political power play? The Trump administration has warned California, Washington, and New Mexico that...
-
Credit: Shutterstock Justice reform or political theater? President Trump has never shied away from bold moves, and his latest...
-
Credit: Shutterstock In a political twist that could have come straight out of a financial drama, Federal Reserve Governor...
-
Credit: Shutterstock When the Law Becomes a Chessboard, the People Always Lose Alina Habba, best known as one of...
-
Credit: Shutterstock Jeanine Pirro’s new policy is shaking up law, safety, and politics Washington, D.C., just got hit with...
-
Credit: Shutterstock Massachusetts Mom Detained for 20-Year-Old Marijuana Conviction A Massachusetts mother who has lived legally in the U.S....
-
Credit: Envato Elements Over 6,000 Students Had Their Visas Revoked The Trump administration has revoked over 6,000 student visas,...