DOJ Under Fire After Epstein Image Removal Raises Cover Up Fears

A brief removal of a high-profile photo reignites bipartisan pressure on the Justice Department to fully release long-awaited Epstein records
DOJ Under Fire After Epstein Image Removal Raises Cover Up Fears
Credit: Shutterstock
 

The Department of Justice has reversed course and restored previously removed images from the Jeffrey Epstein document release, following public backlash and bipartisan concern over transparency. The brief disappearance of a photograph showing former President Donald Trump, Melania Trump, Jeffrey Epstein, and Ghislaine Maxwell sparked accusations of a cover-up and intensified scrutiny of how the long-awaited files are being handled.

The image, taken in February 2000 at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, was temporarily pulled during the Justice Department’s review process. According to the DOJ, officials acted “out of an abundance of caution” to ensure no Epstein victims appeared in the photograph. After review, the department concluded that the image did not depict victims and reposted it without any changes.

The move did little to quiet critics. Representatives Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) announced they are rallying colleagues from both parties to consider holding Attorney General Pam Bondi in contempt, arguing the Justice Department failed to meet a congressional deadline to release all eligible Epstein-related records. The lawmakers have warned that continued delays could result in fines, censure, or even impeachment proceedings.

“This is about accountability and justice for survivors,” Khanna said in recent interviews, emphasizing that any official who obstructs justice could face consequences now or in the future. Massie echoed that urgency, calling contempt proceedings the fastest way to compel full disclosure.

The controversy follows passage of the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which required the administration to release unclassified records by December 19. While tens of thousands of pages have been made public, lawmakers and advocates say key materials are still missing, including FBI interviews with victims and internal Justice Department memos explaining why Epstein avoided serious federal charges for years.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer joined the criticism, warning that selective releases risk becoming “one of the biggest cover-ups in American history” if unanswered questions persist. House Oversight Democrats similarly asked what else may have been withheld.

Justice Department officials pushed back. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche said hundreds of attorneys are conducting a careful, document-by-document review to protect victim identities, stressing that redactions are required by law. He dismissed threats of contempt or impeachment, insisting the department is complying fully with the statute.

Despite the growing volume of released material—including grand jury transcripts and previously unseen photos—the disclosures have so far offered limited new insight into prosecutorial decisions that shaped the Epstein case. Survivors’ accounts reveal harrowing details of abuse and recruitment of minors, while internal deliberations highlight how concerns about jury perception and legal boundaries influenced charging decisions.

As pressure mounts from both sides of the aisle, the restored images have become a symbol of a larger debate: whether the public is seeing the full picture or just a carefully curated slice. Lawmakers say the coming weeks will determine whether transparency promises are fulfilled—or whether Congress escalates its response to force the rest of the files into the open.

December 22, 2025

Xavier M. - Dec 19, 2025