California non-profits are no longer required to disclose their donors.
Californian law has a particular rule that requires all charitable and non-profit organizations to disclose the names of their contributors. This law was put in place to combat the increase of “dark money” politics, anonymous donations from politicians intended to garner favor without affecting their public optics. Unfortunately, as of today, that rule is no longer a rule.
The United States Supreme Court has invalidated the disclosure rule with a 6-3 ruling along party lines.
Breaking News: The Supreme Court rejected California’s requirement that charities report the identities of major donors, siding with conservative groups who said the disclosures could lead to harassment. https://t.co/lU6a9z32EA
— The New York Times (@nytimes) July 1, 2021
“The upshot is that California casts a dragnet for sensitive donor information from tens of thousands of charities each year, even though that information will become relevant in only a small number of cases involving filed complaints,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor fired back, saying that the ruling will allow a greater influx of anonymous, potentially fraudulent money to pass through charities. She added that the court “trades precision for blunt force” and creates a “significant risk that it will topple disclosure regimes that should be constitutional.”
JUST IN: The Supreme Court throws out a California rule on charitable donor disclosures in case that's feared could let more "dark money" into politics https://t.co/569hNscsnQ
— CNN (@CNN) July 1, 2021
The challenge was originally raised by the American for Prosperity Foundation and the Thomas More Law Center, conservative non-profit organizations that the state had failed to provide a compelling reason for the rule’s existence.
‘Willy Wonka’ Cast Weigh in on Timothée Chalamet
Jeff Bezos Steps Down as Amazon CEO Next Week
-
The Trump campaign is optimistic about winning the Iowa caucuses, anticipating a significant margin as a litmus test. A...
-
President Biden takes action in response to attack on U.S. service members Early Christmas morning, three U.S. service members...
-
Concerns Rise as Inner Circle Signals Retribution Against Opponents and Media Recent statements from key allies within Donald Trump’s...
-
President Biden invokes the Defense Production Act to strengthen American supply chains. In a strategic move to fortify American...
-
An alarming surge in harassment prompts security concerns, as court staff, including Judge Engoron and his clerk, grapple with...
-
Former First Lady’s Legacy Lives On in Dedication to Caregiving, Peace, and Mental Health Reform The Carter Center announces...
-
Is the Tension Between China and the U.S. Increasing? Following four hours of straightforward summit talks on the outskirts...
-
Taking Precautions in Uganda and Kenya for Safe Travels The U.S. Embassy has recently issued important security alerts for...
-
Meta’s Oversight Board to Review Handling of Manipulated Biden Video Facebook’s refusal to remove a leaked video of President...
-
Congressman accused of credit card misuse and identity theft, as legal challenges persist. U.S. prosecutors have brought a fresh...
-
First-ever Criminal Prosecution of a Sitting President’s Child Sparks National Interest and Legal Debate In a landmark legal case,...
-
President Biden’s Performance Under a Strict Spotlight In the current climate of intense media scrutiny and heightened political divisions,...