
Court says only a Senate-confirmed board has that power
A federal judge has blocked the Trump administration’s effort to remove Michael Abramowitz, the director of Voice of America (VOA), ruling that the move violated federal law.
The ruling
U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth issued a permanent injunction on August 28, stating that only the International Broadcasting Advisory Board, which requires Senate confirmation, has the legal authority to dismiss a VOA director. Since President Trump had previously dissolved that board, his appointee, Kari Lake, lacked the power to fire Abramowitz. The court described the attempted dismissal as “plainly contrary to law.”
What triggered the dispute
Kari Lake, appointed by Trump to oversee the U.S. Agency for Global Media, had ordered Abramowitz removed after he refused reassignment to manage a transmitting station. The decision was part of a larger restructuring effort at USAGM that included layoffs and attempts to consolidate leadership control over federally funded international broadcasters.
Responses from both sides
Abramowitz, a veteran journalist and former Washington Post editor, praised the court’s decision. He emphasized that VOA’s independence is essential for its mission of providing reliable, fact-based news to global audiences, particularly in regions where press freedom is restricted.
Lake strongly criticized the ruling, framing it as an attack on presidential authority. She vowed to appeal, arguing that the executive branch must retain the ability to restructure agencies and remove officials who resist new directives.
Why it matters
The case highlights an ongoing struggle over the independence of U.S.-funded international media outlets. Critics of Trump’s moves see them as attempts to politicize VOA, while supporters argue that the administration should have greater control over taxpayer-funded institutions.
For now, Abramowitz will remain in his post, and the ruling reasserts a clear boundary: leadership at Voice of America cannot be removed without Senate involvement.
Bottom line
The clash over VOA is bigger than one job; it’s about the balance between executive authority and the legal safeguards designed to protect press independence. With an appeal likely, the fight over who controls America’s international voice is far from over.
Family Says ChatGPT Became Their Son’s “Suicide Coach”
16 Classic Cars from Top Brands That No Longer Exist
-
Credit: Shutterstock Bay Area residents who recently glanced up over the Golden Gate Bridge were treated to an unexpected...
-
Credit: Shutterstock As President Donald Trump abruptly turned against Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, one of his most vocal supporters,...
-
Credit: Shutterstock In a dramatic twist that’s sent shockwaves through both sides of the Atlantic, U.S. President Donald Trump...
-
Credit: Shutterstock President Donald J. Trump sparked fresh political fireworks during a wide-ranging interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes, revealing...
-
Credit: Shutterstock While government offices sit quiet amid the ongoing federal shutdown, the White House grounds are anything but...
-
Credit: Shutterstock Everything You Need to Know President Donald Trump accused Senate Democrats of “holding the federal government hostage”...
-
Credit: Shutterstock Ruling marks key step in ongoing legal fight over federal authority and state control The Ninth Circuit...
-
Credit: Shutterstock The White House grounds haven’t seen a sight like this in decades — cranes, bulldozers, and construction...
-
Credit: Shutterstock Phil Mickelson isn’t just swinging golf clubs these days — he’s swinging at political rivals too. The...
-
Credit: Shutterstock Peaceful rallies across all 50 states mark one of the largest single-day protest movements in U.S. history...
-
Credit: Shutterstock The end of quantitative tightening may not be the market boost it appears to be Federal Reserve...
-
Credit: Shutterstock Here’s Everything You Need to Know On October 6, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court quietly slammed the...
